The philosophy of ranking


In the book Decision Quality, one will be trained to have three decision making system; one of them is the quick decision. Actually, when we do the decision—big decision like choosing a school and small decision like where to eat—we rank them in our minds.

So, put the philosophy to the general area, and you will find a fantastic world. For me, I have a dozen of ranking electric tables (MS Excel): 1) The beloved beliefs and values, 2) private book list for belief, value, efficiency and 3) leisure activities etc.

The scores and ranks will be updated according to more information and the passing of time.

Suddenly, life becomes clear and concise. And this philosophy is consonant with the last article: to complete the most important 0.1% of the to-do list items are really good enough to have a good achievement.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Two types of people with high scores of English exams

I believe that there are two types of people who get high scores in English exams: 1) have high intelligence. 2) spend time several times more than others on English learning so that their English levels outperform the level that the English exam requires. If, in a particular circumstance, these two sorts of people compete with each other in an English exam within a limited time period (e.g. two weeks), then the first type of people will win with ease, and the second type of people will be beat miserably. Presumably, the first type of people accounts for 20% of all people. Some of the second sort of people, after the continuous frustrating wars of exams, finds that there is no way to outcome the other type of people, thus begin to believe that Intelligence indicates the scores of exams and those people with high intelligence are born winners. Fortunately, I don't have the hypothesis of "within a limited time" now (at least during this time...
Read more

Of efficiency and methodology

There are only too many articles and books which pertains to the discussion of efficiency and methodology. In book [1], the author believes that in terms of developing a production of software, the pragmatic method is to develop a good-enough version of software, and then to improve it while it is used by consumers. To put it in a general question, a good-enough method is also a satisfactory way to make the things run. In the Zhihu answer [2], when one individual would like to acquaint himself with a new knowledge area (e.g. purchasing money market funds), there are several ways: 1) use Internet search tool to know the basic knowledge. 2) consult an expert about the outline and important point (a good way is to search this question in zhihu.com or quora.com). 3) and then choose a learning path and learn it systematically. And, if possible, the good way is learning by doing. In book [3], Li asserts that one should directly practice the method given by a good teacher...
Read more